308 - Phase I/II Prospective Dose Escalation Trial with Proton-Based Radiation Therapy for Chordomas and Chondrosarcomas of the Skull Base and Cervical Spine: Long-Term Results from Proton Radiation Oncolog
Massachusets General Hospital boston, Massachusetts
M. Ioakeim-Ioannidou1, B. Y. Yeap2, Z. Soetan3, D. Packard4, A. Tejada5, R. Hegazy6, E. S. R. Todary7, J. A. Adams8, H. M. Kooy9, F. Giap10, Y. L. E. E. Chen8, T. F. DeLaney8, M. Goitein11, J. E. Munzenrider12, E. B. Hug13, and S. M. MacDonald8; 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 2Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 3Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 4Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 5Columbia Univeristy Irving Medical Center, NYC, NY, 6Childrens Cancer Hospital Egypt, Cairo, Egypt, 7Childrens Cancer Hospital Cairo, Cairo, Egypt, 8Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 9Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 10University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, 11Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 12Massachussets General Hospital, Boston, MA, 13MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
Purpose/Objective(s): To assess the outcomes of skull base and spinal chordomas (CH) and chondrosarcomas (CHS) treated to three radiation dose levels. Materials/
Methods: We designed a prospective Phase I/II dose searching trial in adult patients with CH and CHS of the base of skull (BOS) and cervical spine (CS) assigned to three dose arms: 70 Gy (RBE), 76 Gy (RBE), and 83 Gy (RBE) of fractionated combined proton/photon radiotherapy (RT) with >70% of the dose delivered with protons at a single institution. The primary endpoint was local control with hypothesis of improved tumor control with higher dose. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, cancer-specific survival, progression-free survival, and rates of treatment-related toxicities graded according to CTCAE v5. Results: Between 1987 and 2007, 381 patients were assigned to three dose arms. Two patients refused assigned treatment; therefore, 379 patients were analyzed: 128 patients were assigned 70 Gy (RBE), 193 to 76 Gy (RBE), and 58 to 83 Gy (RBE). The median follow-up for entire cohort was 27 years (IQR, 22-30). Local failure for the entire cohort was 23% at 5 years, 31% at 10 years and 37% at 20 years. Local failure at 5-, 10-, and 20-years were 20%, 28%, and 38% for the low-dose group, 23%, 32%, and 36% for the intermediate-dose group, and 27%, 34%, and 40% for the high-dose group (p=0.86). Overall survival at 5, 10, and 20 y was 88%, 66%, and 50% for the low-dose group, 87%, 64%, and 47% for the intermediate-dose group, and 82%, 63%, and 35% for the high-dose group (p=0.31). Cancer-specific survival at 5, 10, and 20 y was 91%, 76%, and 70% for the low-dose group, 91%, 75%, and 65% for the intermediate-dose group, and 84%, 69%, and 58% for the high-dose group (p=0.41). Progression-free survival at 5, 10, and 20 y was 74%, 60%, and 42% for the low-dose group, 68%, 51%, and 39% for the intermediate-dose group, and 59%, 44%, and 24% for the high-dose group (p=0.06). All survival outcomes were significantly worse in chordoma patients. There was no statistically significant difference in outcomes between skull base and spinal tumors. Late RT injury = grade 2 was reported in a total of 92 (24%) patients at a similar rate across all dose levels with 27% in the low-dose group, 23% in the intermediate-dose group, and 24% in the high-dose group (p=0.74). 14 (4%) patients suffered a cerebrovascular accident, 13 (3%) patients developed osteoradionecrosis, 13 (3%) patients had brainstem necrosis, and 21 (6%) patients had a symptomatic temporal lobe injury. 8 (2%) patients developed secondary tumors in the previous RT field. Conclusion: This is the first report of the largest trial of patients with CH and CHS of the skull base and the spine assigned to three different dose arms. Proton-based RT is effective for those tumors with no apparent benefit in dose escalation. Despite high doses, the rates of grade II-V late toxicities were low across all dose arms.