PQA 10 - PQA 10 Head & Neck Cancer and Health Services Research/Global Oncology Poster Q&A
3724 - Safe Deviation from the "5+5" Expansion Rule for the Delineation of Primary Tumor Clinical Target Volume (CTV-P) in Oropharyngeal Cancer: A Prospective Cohort Study
V. Salvestrini1, C. Becherini1, M. Zani2, I. Desideri3, L. P. Ciccone4, B. Bettazzi1, D. Cela1, S. Pallotta5, G. Simontacchi1, M. Loi1, D. Greto1, G. Francolini1, L. Livi3, and P. Bonomo1; 1Radiation Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy, 2Medical Physics, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy, 3Department of Experimental Clinical and Biomedical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, Florence, Italy, 4Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica, Fondazione CNAO, Pavia, Italy, 5University of Florence, Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences “Mario Serio", Florence, Italy
Purpose/Objective(s): Over the past decades, the optimal target volume for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma has been widely investigated. The “5+5” expansion rule for CTV-P was postulated by the latest international consensus guidelines [1]. As per our local standard of practice (SoP), since Jan 2015 the 10 mm margin expansion from gross tumor volume (GTV) of the primary tumor (CTV-P2) was not part of target delineation for oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). Thus, in the context of a controlled, prospective, single-center cohort of patients (pts) we aimed to assess the pattern of failure after the omission of CTV-P2 while exploring its impact on toxicityand potential dosimetric implications Materials/
Methods: Target definition for pts affected by OPC has been performed in accordance with our SoP. The CTV-P1 consisted of primary GTV with an isotropic expansion of 5 mm margin, edited for air cavities and anatomical barriers. A 3-mm margin was added to CTV-P1 (PTV-P1). An IMRT-SIB 3-D CRT and IMRT system technique was adopted. A 3-dose level prescription was applied: high, intermediate and low risk PTVs received 69.9, 59.4 and 52.8 Gy in 33 fractions, respectively.Concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy (cht) was administered as per SoP. According to international guidelines [1], a CTV-P2 was retrospectively delineated by 3 radiation oncologists, blinded to the clinical outcome data, and then expanded by 3 mm (PTV-P2). Median local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method. To describe whether the incidence of >G2 oral mucositis was correlated with PTV-P2 coverage, a Mann Whitney test was used. Results: From Jan 2015 to Sep 2020, 100 pts were included in our cohort. The median age was 63 years. The vast majority (69%) had HPV-related OPC and received concurrent cht (91%). According to TNM 7th edition, 80% of pts had stage III/IV disease. At a median follow-up of 55 months (range: 1-109), 77 patients were alive and 57 had no evidence of disease. Median LC and PFS were not reached while 3-year LC and PFS rates of 85% and 68 %were found. The median OS was 97 months (95%CI 81.2-96.6). The main pattern of failure was distant (23%). Overall, a low crude rate of local failure was reported (15%). Out of 15 local events (6 HPV + and 9 HPV - cases), 12 in-fieldand 3 marginal relapses, referring to the high-risk volume (PTV-P1), were collected. No correlation was found when comparing the incidence of >G2 oral mucositis in respect to PTV-P2 coverage above or below 95%, corresponding to 56.4 Gy (p=0.68). Conclusion: In a cohort of OPC pts treated uniformly with a 3-dose level prescription, our SoP based on the omission of 10 mm expansion for CTV-P2 did not result in a detrimental effect on LC. Longer follow-up is needed to ascertain its impact on oncologic outcome and late toxicity. Reference