PQA 03 - PQA 03 Gynecological Cancer, Pediatric Cancer, and Professional Development Poster Q&A
3489 - Efficacy of Concurrent Intensity Modulated Chemoradiotherapy Combined with Induction Chemotherapy or Adjuvant Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Locally Cervical Cancer with 2018FIGO Stage Correction
Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University Liuzhou, Guangxi
S. Chen1, T. Ren2, M. Wei3, C. Feng1, X. Wang4, Y. Shen5, Z. Lin6, H. Huang1, and D. Zeng7; 1Department of Medical Oncology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Liuzhou, Guangxi, China, 2Department of Medical Oncology, The nangning First Peoples Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi,, nanning, China, 3The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University,Liuzhou, Guangxi, China, 2, Liuzhou, China, 4Department of Gynaecology, The Maternity and child Health Care Hospital , Liuzhou, Guangxi, China,, chensh, China, 5Department of Oncology,The first affiliated hospital of Guangxi university of science and technology, Liuzhou, Guangxi, China, 6Department of Oncology, The Yulin First Peoples Hospital, Yulin, Guangxi, China, 7Department of Gynaecology, The Maternity and child Health Care Hospital, Liuzhou,Guangxi, China
Purpose/Objective(s):Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is currently the standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC), but there is a lot of room for treatment strategiesimprovement forthe survival rate of patients is low,Comprehensive treatment is the treatment direction for locallyadvanced cervical cancer, The current comprehensive treatment models for locallyadvanced cervical cancer mainly include induction chemotherapy (IC) plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and CCRT plus adjuvant chemotherapy (AC),but it remains is unclear which is optimal sequence of combined chemotherapy. The purpose of this study is to retrospectively report the outcome of long-term survivaland related toxicity that IC plus CCRT versus CCRT plus CCRT inLACC.Materials/
Methods: From December 2016 toJanuary 2019,358 patients with LACCwho initiallyunderwent IC plus CCRT or CCRT plus AC from the Forth Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University. All patients received cisplatin 40mg/m2, weekly one cycle concurrently with intensity-modulated radiation therapy. The IC plus CCRT group received platinum-based combined chemotherapy with two or three cycles before CCRT. CCRT plus AC group received platinum-based combined chemotherapy with two cycles after CCRT.3-year overall survival (OS), 3-year progression free Survival survival (PFS),local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) andtreatment-related adverse reactions were evaluated and compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 332 patients with complete follow-up data are available were included our study. Among these patients, 170 underwent the IC plus CCRT and 162 were treated with the CCRT plus AC. IC/ACregimens included TP/DP (cisplatin+Paclitaxel/Docetaxel) and TC/DC(carboplatin+Paclitaxel/Docetaxel) . The median follow-up of 38months (range30-50). No significant differences were detected between the two groups on the 3-year OS rates (83.5% vs. 80.2%), or LRFS rates (84.9% vs 84.8%) and DMFS rates (78.5% vs 75.5%) (all P > 0.05). Subgroup analysis revealed that CCRT plus ACwas associated with significantly improved PFS (HR=0.627, 95% CI= 0.419-0.937, P = 0.023) in 2018FIGO IIIB-IVA stage. There was no significant difference in adverse events (acute toxicities and late toxicities) between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: There is no statistical difference between IC plus CCRT and CCRT plus AC in the outcome of long-term survival of LACC. However, the adjuvant therapy may be more advantageous especially for the patients with 2018FIGO IIIB-IVAstage of LACC.