Screen: 21
Basil Chaballout, MD
David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA
Riverside, CA
Purpose/Objective(s): Image-based mnemonic resources, such as SketchyMedical©, have become popular in medical education and use the “method of loci” memorization technique to effectively promote retention. We used AI image generators to create a similar platform for radiation oncology (RO). Here we report the results of our survey evaluating residents’ opinions of the platform.
Materials/
Methods: Five images were generated using the AI software DALL-E© and Midjourney© and refined with editing software. The mnemonics symbolized the RAPIDO and UK Fast Forward trials, treatment eligibility for accelerated partial breast irradiation, OAR constraints for conventional CNS and H&N treatments, and low energy photon interactions. A 15 question survey was made using a 5-point Likert Scale and sent to 648 PGY1-5 RO residents to assess educational experience and perceived usefulness of the mnemonics.
Results: 41 responses were recorded. Median age was 31 (IQR=4) years. Training level comprised of 2.4% PGY1, 24.4% PGY2, 19.5% PGY3, 31.7% PGY4, and 22.0% PGY5.
Full results are shown in Table 1. All respondents were familiar with image-based mnemonics and 82.9% used them in medical school. Respondents strongly or somewhat agreed that memorizing details related to clinical trials (87.8%), treatment regimens (87.8%), OAR constraints (87.8%), and physics concepts (82.9%) is time-consuming. They found the mnemonics helpful for learning clinical trials (70.7%), treatment regimens (70.7%), OAR constraints (63.4%), and physics concepts (58.5%). Most (87.8%) wished this platform previously existed, and 65.9% could envision using it. 58.5% felt the detail in the mnemonics was sufficient and 92.7% felt they were most useful when accompanied by a story. 53.7% could see themselves contributing to our platform. Written feedback suggested decreasing text and adding consistent symbols across images.
Conclusion: Our findings strongly suggest residents in radiation oncology endorse the efficacy of AI image-based mnemonics and express a desire for their integration into educational frameworks.
Abstract 3486 – Table 1 | |||||
Questions (shortened) | Strongly Agree (%) | Somewhat Agree (%) | Neither Agree Nor Disagree (%)
| Somewhat Disagree (%)
| Strongly Disagree (%)
|
Familiar with image-based mnemonics (IBM) | 82.9 | 17.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Previously IBM use | 58.5 | 24.4 | 7.3 | 7.3 | 2.4 |
Difficulty memorizing: Clinical trials Treatment regimens/eligibility OAR constraints Physics |
68.3 58.5 58.5 53.7 |
19.5 29.3 29.3 29.3 |
2.4 7.3 4.9 9.8 |
2.4 2.4 2.4 7.3 |
2.4 2.4 4.9 0.0 |
Desire for IBM | 56.1 | 31.7 | 9.8 | 2.4 | 0.0 |
IBMs aid memory of: Clinical trials Treatment regimens/eligibility OAR constraints Physics |
39.0 34.2 36.6 26.8 |
31.7 36.6 26.8 31.7 |
17.1 19.5 19.5 17.1 |
9.8 9.8 14.6 19.5 |
0.0 0.0 2.4 4.9 |
I would use IBM in RO | 41.5 | 24.4 | 24.4 | 7.3 | 2.4 |
IBM details were sufficient | 17.1 | 41.5 | 9.8 | 19.5 | 7.3 |
IBMs work best with a story | 78.1 | 14.6 | 7.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Would make IBMs if <1hr/image | 19.5 | 34.1 | 17.1 | 22.0 | 2.4 |