Screen: 21
Andrew Kennedy, MD, FACRO
Sarah Cannon Cancer Center at TriStar Health
Nashville, TN, United States
Materials/Methods: Following 90Y RE with glass microspheres, three patients underwent CT imaging and either PET/CT (n=2) or SPECT/CT (n=1) imaging. Patient 1 had two hepatic tumors and patients 2 and 3 had a single tumor. For PET/CT and SPECT/CT, post-treatment dosimetry was performed using the local deposition method with known activity. For CT, a 90Y activity distribution was calculated using a calibration curve to translate Hounsfield Units [HU] to microsphere concentration [mg/mL], followed by scaling with the net administered activity [Bq/mg]. The CT-based dose distribution was calculated through convolution of the 90Y activity distribution and a dose voxel kernel. Dose-volume histograms were computed for perfused liver volumes (PV), tumors (T), and the perfused normal liver (NL). Extracted dose metrics included the mean dose (Dmean) as well as D70% for T and V100Gy for NL. Dose metrics were compared between CT- and PET- or SPECT-based dosimetry.
Results: For patient 1, T1 and T2 had a percent difference between CT- and SPECT-based Dmean of -2.4% and 251.3%, respectively. For patients 2 and 3, T1 had a percent difference between CT- and PET-based Dmean of 1.2% and -59.1%, respectively. The percent difference in Dmean to PV was -12.4%, -31.1%, and -24.6% for patients 1, 2, and 3, respectively. For NL, percent differences in Dmean were -54.8%, -61.8%, and -19.3% for patients 1, 2, and 3, respectively. V100Gy for NL was consistently smaller in CT-based dosimetry with percent differences of -75.9%, -11.8%, and -32.0% for patients 1, 2, and 3, respectively, while D70% percent differences varied between -82.2% and 22.4%. Absolute values for Dmean, D70%, and V100Gy are provided in the table.
Conclusion: 90Y RE with radiopaque glass microspheres presents a novel opportunity to evaluate treatment success through CT-based dosimetry. Due to improved spatial resolution and mitigation of respiratory motion effects, CT-based dosimetry in 90Y RE has the potential to provide more accurate dose metrics relative to either PET- or SPECT-based dosimetry. This claim required validation in a prospective study with a large patient cohort.
Abstract 2323 - Table 1
Patient 1 | VOI | PV | T1 | T2 | NL | |||
Dose Metric | Dmean [Gy] | Dmean [Gy] | D70% [Gy] | Dmean [Gy] | D70% [Gy] | Dmean [Gy] | V100Gy [%] | |
SPECT | 139.3 | 202.9 | 184.2 | 444.0 | 400.2 | 127.7 | 64.3 | |
CT | 122.0 | 198.1 | 66.4 | 1559.9 | 489.8 | 57.7 | 15.5 | |
Patient 2 | VOI | PV | T1 | NL | ||||
Dose Metric | Dmean [Gy] | Dmean [Gy] | D70% [Gy] | Dmean [Gy] | V100Gy [%] | |||
PET | 422.5 | 1204.0 | 384.2 | 296.4 | 35.7 | |||
CT | 290.9 | 1218.5 | 389.0 | 113.1 | 31.5 | |||
Patient 3 | VOI | PV | T1 | NL | ||||
Metric | Dmean [Gy] | Dmean [Gy] | D70% [Gy] | Dmean [Gy] | V100Gy [%] | |||
PET | 198.2 | 200.7 | 131.8 | 197.8 | 54.0 | |||
CT | 149.5 | 82.0 | 23.4 | 159.6 | 36.7 |