PQA 05 - PQA 05: Breast Cancer and Nonmalignant Disease Poster Q&A
2670 - Stereotactic Radiotherapy (SRT) with Maintenance Systemic Therapy vs. Standard-of-Care (SOC) Systemic Therapy for Oligoprogressive ER-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer (AVATAR II)
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre North Melbourne, Vic
E. Connolly1, M. White2, S. Siva1, M. Bressel3, J. Tan1, K. Byrne1, D. Day2, A. McCartney2, K. Webber2, and S. P. David1; 1Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 2Department of Oncology, Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 3Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Purpose/Objective(s): The AVATAR I Trial[1]demonstrated that oligoprogressive luminal (ER positive, HER2 negative) advanced breast cancer patients undergoing established first-line systemic therapy for metastatic disease benefited from SRT as second-line therapy along with their original systemic treatment. A modified PFS, defined as a disease progression not amenable to SRT treatment, was reported as 10.4 months. Given this result, this trial in progress seeks to assess if SRT combined with systemic therapy CDK4/6 inhibitor and Aromatase Inhibitor (CDK4/6+AI) can improve the Quality of Life (QoL) for this cohort of patients. Materials/
Methods: AVATAR II is a Phase 2 randomised control trial that enrols patients with advanced luminal breast cancer who have received first-line systemic treatment in the metastatic setting with a CDK4/6+AI. Patients require at least 1 extracranial oligoprogressing lesion amenable to SRT. Patients who had chemotherapy for metastatic disease, leptomeningeal disease,or prior radiotherapy to an oligoprogessing lesion were excluded. Patients were randomised to Arm A; SRT to all oligoprogressing lesions and continue CDK4/6+AI systemic therapy or Arm B; no SRT and review to assess if a change in systemic therapy is required. If a patient subsequently progresses, further SRT was permitted to delay a change in systemic therapy in patients who had received SRT as part of the trial. At 3-monthly reviews, patient reported outcomes are measured using the EORTC QLQ C30 and FACT-B forms.The trial is expected to recruit 74 patients. The primary endpoint is the area under the curve (AUC) of the Quality of Life/Global Health Status score from the EORTC QLQ-C30 from baseline to the 12-month follow-up visit. The secondary endpoints are to determine Progression-free Survival (PFS) and PFS 2, defined as the time from randomisation to the date of first and second evidence of progression, respectively. Other secondary endpoints include ST-PFS, defined as randomisation to the first evidence of progression requiring change in systemic therapy, Overall Survival, treatment-related toxicity and further QoL assessment using AUC of the FACT-B Total score from baseline to 12 months. Results: TBD Conclusion: Assessing quality of life (QoL) is integral to evaluating the overall impact of cancer treatment. AVATAR II aims to demonstrate that by delaying a change in systemic therapy and potentially more potent side effects, receiving SRT at this stage in a patient’s treatment paradigm will have a more positive impact on patients QoL. [1] David SP, Siva S, Bressel M, Tan J, Hanna GG, Alomran RK, et al. Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy (SRT) for Oligoprogressive ER-Positive Breast Cancer (AVATAR): A Phase II Prospective Multicenter Trial. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics. 2023;117(4):e6-e.